What I liked from my method (audio-lingual method) is
that the teacher doesn´t use the mother tongue, and that really helps students
to be more critical in the target language because they are capable to develop
their thinking in the target language; additionally, pronunciation and
memorization are exclusively highlighted by the teacher. Thus, I think that is amazing
to have these skills being taught as the students become more likely target
language speakers.
What I didn´t like from my method (audio-lingual
method) is that the teacher doesn´t teach the pupils some drills, such as:
writing and reading, that are totally essential for the learning of the target
language. Consequently, the teacher doesn´t lay emphasis on the grammatical
points that are really important for writing and even for speaking in the
target language. Furthermore, the repetition of dialogues can be boring for the students and that can led the students not to pay attention during the class.
What I understood from the Direct Method is that the
teacher involves his teaching with the communication of the students, so that, they
are able to engage a conversation to one another but in the target language, which
is the center of this method. Likewise, what I understood from the Silent Way
Method is that students develop their own learning, and that the teacher is
just the mediator of his/her pupils´ learning process. Additionally, the
teacher gives the students the material or tools, and the students are required
to work by their own. To sum up, Students are the authors of their own
learning.